<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="164">
<titleInfo>
<title><![CDATA[Comparison Several Hue Preserving Image Enhancement Methods from Under Exposure Image]]></title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Felix Indra Kurniadi</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Pengarang</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes"><![CDATA[mixed material]]></typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt"><![CDATA[bibliography]]></genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text"><![CDATA[Yogyakarta]]></placeTerm></place>
<publisher><![CDATA[Universitas Gajah Mada]]></publisher>
<dateIssued><![CDATA[2019]]></dateIssued>
<issuance><![CDATA[monographic]]></issuance>
<edition><![CDATA[0]]></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code"><![CDATA[0]]></languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text"><![CDATA[]]></languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd"><![CDATA[Proceeding]]></form>
<extent><![CDATA[]]></extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>An  image  with  poor  contrast,  improper  brightness,  and  low  saturation  generates  a  lot  of  missing  information.  This  problem  can  be  solved  with  enhancing  the  image  saturation  without  changing  the  hue  and  range  values  of  the  image.  In  this  paper, we compared three different hue preserving methods: Hue Preserving  Image  Enhancement  without  gamut  problem,  Hue  and  Range  Preserving  RGB  Image  Enhancement  and  Modified  Hue  Preserving  Image  Enhancement  without  gamut  problem.  The  results  were  evaluated  using  Peak  Signal  Noise  to  Ratio  as  one  of  the  references  evaluation  score  and  Blind  Referenceless  Image  Spatial  Quality  Evaluator  as  the  natural  image  evaluation  score. From three different methods, Hue and Range Preserving RGB Image Enhancement give the best result compared the other two.</note>
<classification><![CDATA[]]></classification><identifier type="isbn"><![CDATA[]]></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation><![CDATA[Repository Files Documentation TANRI ABENG UNIVERSITY]]></physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator><![CDATA[]]></shelfLocator>
</location>
<slims:digitals>
<slims:digital_item id="184" url="" path="/Full_list Comparison Hue.pdf" mimetype="application/pdf"><![CDATA[Comparison Several Hue Preserving Image Enhancement Methods from Under Exposure Image]]></slims:digital_item>
<slims:digital_item id="179" url="" path="/Peer Reviewer_Prosiding 2.pdf" mimetype="application/pdf"><![CDATA[Peer Reviewer]]></slims:digital_item>
</slims:digitals><recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier><![CDATA[164]]></recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf"><![CDATA[2020-09-18 14:18:32]]></recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf"><![CDATA[2020-09-22 11:19:15]]></recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin><![CDATA[machine generated]]></recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>